Classification of agricultural activities costs in accounting and control in the conditions of using geo- information technologies

Authors

  • Dmytro Minaiev Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
  • Yuriy Radelytskyy Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2023.03.097

Keywords:

accounting, control, agricultural economics, agribusiness expenses, agricultural enterprises, geo-information technologies, GIS technologies

Abstract

Introduction. Activities in the agribusiness sector are characterized by significant variability of costs, which can be explained by the specific organizational and technological features of agricultural production. Among such industry-specific characteristics of the agricultural sphere, in the context of the digitization of socio-economic processes, the impact of geo-information technologies (GIS technologies) is pertinent. For the purpose of effective agribusiness management utilizing modern geo-information technologies, the identification and systematization of costs from the perspective of accounting and control are essential. Operating with high-quality and comprehensive accounting information about agribusiness expenses is an element of management efforts aimed at minimizing and optimizing them, thus defining the relevance of the topic and enabling the formulation of the article’s objective.

Purpose. The aim of the article is to identify and classify agribusiness expenses from the standpoint of accounting and control within the framework of implementing advanced geo-information technologies in the management of agricultural enterprises.

Methods. In the process of conducting this scientific research, a systematic methodological approach was employed in conjunction with innovative, functional methods, and methodological tools of synthesis, bibliographic, and comparative analysis.

Results. The importance and relevance of classifying expenses of agricultural enterprises from the standpoint of accounting and control in agribusiness have been substantiated. The affiliation of classification criteria of agribusiness expenses to three groups (general, industry-specific, specialized) has been explained based on considering the industry-specific functioning of agricultural enterprises. The classification of agribusiness expenses has been carried out according to classification criteria: Inclusion in cost price, Participation in production, Changes in agro-production volume, Economic elements, Expense categories, Production type, Agribusiness stages, Uniform composition, Calculation units, Recognition, Occurrence period, Calendar period, Reporting period, Innovativeness, Capitalization, Appropriateness, Controllability, Relevance, Anticipated occurrence, Extraordinariness, Organic nature, Others. The impact of implementing modern information and communication technologies in the operations of agricultural enterprises on the classification of expenses in agribusiness has been examined. The advantages of utilizing geo-information technologies in expense accounting and control in agribusiness have been identified.

Perspectives. The implementation of digitalization advantages in accounting and management processes using geo-information technologies requires the refinement of the methodology for agribusiness expense accounting and control, which will be the subject of subsequent scientific investigations.

Author Biographies

  • Dmytro Minaiev, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
    graduate student of the Accounting and Auditing Department
  • Yuriy Radelytskyy, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
    D. Sc. (Economics), Professor, Chairperson of the Accounting and Auditing Department

References

Sadovska, I., and Drozhdina, I. (2014). Klasyfikatsiia vytrat na silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstvakh [Classification of costs at agricultural enterprises]. Instytut bukhhalterskoho obliku kontrol ta analiz v umovakh hlobalizatsii – Institute of accounting, control and analysis in the conditions of globalization, 3, 110-113. Retrieved from http://ibo.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/ibo/article/view/175/175 [in Ukrainian].

Cheban, Yu. Yu., and Hatseliuk, V. O. (2016). Oblik vytrat diialnosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv: zakonodavcho-normatyvnyi aspekt [Cost accounting of agricultural enterprises: legislative and regulatory aspect]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy rozvytku – Global and national development problems, 9 , 754 – 758 [in Ukrainian].

Burko, K. V. (2019). Metody obliku vytrat v oblikovii politytsi silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Cost accounting methods in the accounting policy of agricultural enterprises]. Ekonomika. Finansy. Menedzhment: aktualni pytannia nauky i praktyky – Economy. Finances. Management: topical issues of science and practice, 2, 162-178. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efmapnp_2019_2_16 [in Ukrainian].

Veryha, Yu. A., Padusenko, V. V., and Starodub, K. O. (2020). Klasyfikatsiia vytrat silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv dlia tsilei bukhhalterskoho obliku [Classification of costs of agricultural enterprises for accounting purposes]. Ekonomichnyi rozvytok derzhavy ta yii sotsialna stabilnist: Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet-konferentsii molodykh uchenykh, studentiv ta aspirantiv – Economic development of the state and its social stability: Materials of the international scientific and practical Internet conference of young scientists, students and graduate students, June 11. 2020. Poltava: Yury Kondratyuk National University, 141-142 [in Ukrainian].

Farion, V., Pytel, S., and Kornyat, I. (2022). Integrated accounting classification of expenses and incomes of the main activities of passenger carriers. Herald of Economics, 4, 61–73. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2022.04.061 [in English].

Bondarenko, N. M., and Rizchenko, N. V. (2019). Osoblyvosti obliku vytrat i vykhodu produktsii roslynnytstva [Peculiarities of accounting for costs and output of crop production]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the state, 11, 76–82. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2019.11.76 [in Ukrainian].

Pylypenko, K. A. (2020). Otsinka metodiv obliku vytrat i kalkuliuvannia sobivartosti v upravlinni vyrobnytstvom silskohospodarskoi produktsii [Evaluation of methods of cost accounting and cost calculation in agricultural production management]. Retrieved from https://www.pdaa.edu.ua/sites/default/files/nppdaa/3.2/95.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Muravskyi, V., Kundeus, O., Hrytsyshyn, A., and Lutsiv, R. (2023). Accounting in a smart city with the combined use of the Internet of Things and geographic information systems. Herald of Economics, 2, 41-57. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.35774/visnyk2023.02.041 [in English].

Yurchenko, K. H. (2001). Metodyka rozpodilu nepriamykh vytrat vyrobnytstva [The method of distribution of indirect costs of production]. Visnyk podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy – Bulletin of the Tax Service of Ukraine, 39, 59-63 [in Ukrainian].

Pro zatverdzhennia Metodychnykh rekomendatsii z planuvannia, obliku i kalkuliuvannia sobivartosti produktsii (robit, posluh) silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [On the approval of Methodological recommendations for planning, accounting and calculating the cost of production (works, services) of agricultural enterprises]. Nakaz Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky Ukrainy – Order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine № 132, 18.05.2001. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/rada/show/v0132555-01#Text [in Ukrainian].

Leha, O. V., Mokiienko, T. V., Pryidak, T. B., Sirenko, O. V., and Yaloveha, L. V. (2011). Oblik vytrat ta kalkuliuvannia sobivartosti dopomizhnykh vyrobnytstv u silskomu hospodarstvi [Accounting of costs and calculation of the cost of auxiliary production in agriculture]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 10, 40–47. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32702/2306- 6814.2021.10.40 [in Ukrainian].

Desyatnyuk, O., Muravskyi, V. and Shevchuk, O. (2021). Accounting Automation in Agroindustrial Enterprises Using Drones (UAVs). 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), 2021, 337-341. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT52158.2021.9548424 [in English].

Humenna-Derii, M., Shara, Ye., and Sliesar, T. (2022). Oblik, kontrol i analiz vytrat ta zabezpechennia materialno-tekhnichnymy resursamy diialnosti pidpryiemstv u maibutni periody [Accounting, control and analysis of costs and provision of material and technical resources for the activities of enterprises in future periods]. Visnyk Ekonomiky – Herald of Economics, 1, 110-129. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.35774/visnyk2022.01.110 [in Ukrainian].

Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Sudyn, Y., and Muravskyi, V. (2018). Goodwill Assessment in Enterprise Management: Innovative Approaches Using Computer and Communication Technologies. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 43-53. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.4-04 [in English].

Ovcharova, N. V., Kravchenko, O. V., and Ustyk, Ye. S. (2020). Transportni vytraty torhovelnoho pidpryiemstva: osoblyvosti obliku [Transport costs of a trading enterprise: peculiarities of accounting]. Modern Economics, 21, 160-165. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V21(2020)-25 [in Ukrainian].

Ishchenko, Ya. (2019). Oblik vytrat ta vykhodu orhanichnoi silskohospodarskoi produktsii roslynnytstva [Accounting of costs and output of organic agricultural products of crop production]. Instytut bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontrol ta analiz v umovakh hlobalizatsii – Institute of accounting, control and analysis in the conditions of globalization, 3-4, 26-36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35774/ibo2019.03.026 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2023-11-07

How to Cite

Minaiev, Dmytro, and Yuriy Radelytskyy. “Classification of Agricultural Activities Costs in Accounting and Control in the Conditions of Using Geo- Information Technologies”. Herald of Economics, no. 3, Nov. 2023, pp. 97-114, https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2023.03.097.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 356

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.