Network structures as a factor in violation of the principle of completeness of financial reporting

Authors

  • Serhii Lehenchuk Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University
  • Dmytro Zakharov Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/

Keywords:

accounting principles, the principle of full disclosure, financial reporting, related parties, corporate networks, transparency, IFRS

Abstract

Introduction. The principle of full disclosure is fundamental to ensuring the reliability and usefulness of financial reporting. Its essence is that financial information should reflect all facts, events, and potential consequences of economic activity that can affect users’ decision-making. In the Conceptual Framework of IFRS, completeness is considered a qualitative characteristic of a reliable presentation: information should be complete, neutral, and error-free. In Ukrainian legislation, the principle is enshrined in the Law “On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine”, which emphasizes the need to include both actual and potential consequences of economic transactions in the reporting. In the context of network structures, opportunities arise for concealing liabilities, manipulating transfer pricing, falsifying indicators, and incomplete disclosure of transactions with related parties.

Research methods. The research applies methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, institutional approach, and case study to examine international and Ukrainian practices of violating the principle of completeness.

The purpose of the article is to study the essence of the principle of completeness in accordance with IFRS and the legislation of Ukraine, as well as to identify the mechanisms of its violation in the conditions of complex corporate structures.

Results. The theoretical and normative foundations of the principle of full disclosure are analyzed, and the main types of manipulations are identified: concealing transactions with related parties, offsetting liabilities for the balance sheet, non-disclosure of significant transactions, falsifying indicators, and masking beneficiaries. International and Ukrainian examples of violations of the principle of full disclosure are studied. A comparison of international and Ukrainian cases proves that in both cases, the main factor was the existence of complex networks of corporate ties. They created opportunities for circumventing the requirements of completeness and concealing essential information. The results obtained allow us to assert that ensuring the completeness of financial information is possible only under the condition of a comprehensive combination of regulatory requirements, independent audit, and transparency of the ownership structure.

Prospects. Further research is required to quantify the scale of incomplete disclosure of information, the use of digital technologies to identify anomalies in reporting, and to improve institutional control practices in Ukraine.

References

International Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/ issued/part-a/conceptual-framework-for-financial-reporting.pdf. [in English].

On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 996-XIV of July 16, 1999, as of September 3, 2024. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14#Text. [in Ukrainian].

Mizhnarodnyi standart bukhhalterskoho obliku 24 (IAS 24). Rozkryttia informatsii pro zv’iazani storony [Related Party Disclosures]. International Accounting Standards Board. 2012. https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_043#Text. [in Ukrainian].

Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. (2016). Kroll confirmed: before nationalization, PJSC “PrivatBank” was the subject of large-scale and coordinated fraudulent actions that led to losses of at least USD 5.5 billion. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/kroll-pidtverdili-do-natsionalizatsiyi-pat- privatbank-bulo-obyektom-masshtabnih-ta-skoordinovanih-shahrayskih-diy-scho-prizvelo-do- zbitkiv. [in Ukrainian].

Kulyk, V. A., Liubymov, M. O., Tiahnyriadno, L. L. (2019). Pryntsypy obliku: stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Principles of accounting: state and prospects of development]. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. Series: Economic Sciences, 1, 71–76. http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/Nvpusk_2019_1_11. [in Ukrainian].

Dmitrenko, A. V., Pustyak, O. V. (2016). Principles of accounting as a component of accounting methodology for joint activities of business entities. Young Scientist, 5, 53–56. http://nbuv.gov. ua/UJRN/molv_2016_5_16. [in Ukrainian].

Schwarcz, S. L. (2006). Enron and the Use and Abuse of Special Purpose Entities in Corporate Structures. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 70, 1309. Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.306820. [in English].

OCCRP. (2018). Credit Suisse Account Played Role in Scheme That Destroyed Ukrainian Agriculture Firm. https://www.occrp.org/en/project/suisse-secrets/credit-suisse-account-played- role-in-scheme-that-destroyed-ukrainian-agriculture-firm. [in English].

International Accounting Standard 24 (IAS 24). Related Party Disclosures: Standard of the International Accounting Standards Board dated 01.01.2012. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/929_043#Text. [in Ukrainian].

Sarbanes–Oxley Act – application by companies. Akademiia PwC. 2016. https://www.pwc.com/ ua/uk/services/corporate_trainings/assets/SOX_ukr.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Learnsignal. (2020). The Enron Scandal: A Comprehensive Overview. https://www.learnsignal. com/blog/the-enron-scandal-overview/. [in English].

CPDbox. (2019). How to Consolidate Special Purpose Entity – CPDbox – Making IFRS Easy. https://www.cpdbox.com/ifrs-consolidate-spe/. [in English].

Bergin, T., Pal, A. (2017). Steinhoff didn’t tell investors about nearly $1 billion in deals. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/steinhoff-didnt-tell-investors-about-nearly-1-billion-in- deals-idUSKBN1D81BY. [in English].

Naude, P., Hamilton, Br., Ungerer, M., Malan, D., De Klerk, M. (2018). Business Perspectives on the Steinhoff Saga. USB Management Review, June Special Report. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/337740231_BUSINESS_PERSPECTIVES_ON_THE_STEINHOFF_SAGA_ SPECIAL_REPORT_JUNE_2018. [in English].

Large Scale Agriculture. (2018). Why agroholdings go bankrupt. The case of Mriya. https:// www.largescaleagriculture.com/home/news-details/why-agroholdings-go-bankrupt-the-case-of- mriya. [in English].

Consolidated Financial Statements. International Accounting Standards Board. 2013. https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_065#Text. [in Ukrainian].

Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on money market funds. Official Journal of the European Union, 169, 30.6.2017, 8–45. https://eur- lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1131/oj/eng. [in English].

Disclosure of Ultimate Beneficial Owners. Think brave. https://biz.ligazakon.net/aktualno/14090_ rozkrittya-nformats-pro-kntsevikh-beneftsarnikh-vlasnikv. [in Ukrainian].

AML Directives: how they change the “rules of the game”?. I-C-G. https://i-c-g.com.ua/ aml-direktivi-shho-tse-za-dokumenti-ta-yak-voni-zminyuyut-pravila-gri-v-mizhnarodnomu- biznesi/?lang=uk. [in Ukrainian].

Analysis of violations of professional requirements by audit entities regarding the quality of audit services for 2023. Resolution of the Council of the Audit Chamber of Ukraine dated 29.02.2024, protocol No. 135. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Lehenchuk, Serhii, and Dmytro Zakharov. “Network Structures As a Factor in Violation of the Principle of Completeness of Financial Reporting”. Herald of Economics, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 61-72, https://doi.org/10.35774/.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 404

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.