Accounting paradigm in application conditions of electronic information technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2023.02.103Keywords:
accounting, information requests, reporting, theory, methodology, scientific paradigm, information technology, accounting automationAbstract
Introduction. The widespread introduction of modern electronic information and communication technologies into the economy requires a rethinking of the theoretical foundations of accounting. The current accounting methodology, based on the documentation of economic transactions, their reflection on accounts by double entry, balance sheet summarization, was initiated several centuries ago. With the development of automated systems, the latest information technologies for the formation, processing and transmission of information, there is a need of developing of a new accounting paradigm that would reflect not only the new information requests of a wide range of information consumers, but also take into account radical changes in accounting techniques.
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to generalize the existing developments regarding the paradigmatic development of accounting science and to provide proposals for the development of a new accounting paradigm, based on modern information and communication technologies, the new role of accounting as an important economic institution.
Methods. General scientific and empirical methods of knowledge and generalization of past and present processes and phenomena are used to reveal the purpose of the article.\
Results. The existing developments regarding the paradigmatic development of accounting science are summarized. The main features and criteria of each stage of accounting development are defined. The need for the formation of a new accounting paradigm based on the current circumstances in the world economy and society is substantiated. The main criteria that characterize the modern accounting paradigm and distinguish it from the previous ones are the new purpose and tasks of accounting, the introduction of intellectual resources into the accounting system, new approaches to resource assessment. However, the development and introduction of electronic accounting and information systems, which have a significant impact on the methodological and organizational foundations of accounting, collection, registration, processing, storage and transmission of accounting and reporting information, can be considered the main factor in the change of the accounting paradigm.
Perspectives. Further research can be aimed at improving methodological, organizational and technical tools for the practical implementation of a new accounting paradigm based on modern electronic accounting and information systems.
References
Paradyhma (znachennia): material z Vikipedii – vilnoi entsyklopedii [Paradigm (meaning): Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]. Retrieved from https://uk.wikipedia. org/wiki/Парадигма_(значення)#cite_ref-1 [in Ukrainian].
Tomas, S. Kuhn (2001). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions К.: Port-Royal, 228 p. (Tomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed., 1970) [in English].
Chambers, R. J. (1975). Capital Maintenance and Service Potential: A Review Artilce. Abacus. Vol. 1. P. 97-104 [in English].
Wells, M. C. A (1976). Revolution in Accounting Thought? The Accounting Review. Juli, P. 471-482 [in English].
Petruk, O. M. (2004). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady rozvytku bukhhalterskoho obliku v transformatsiinii ekonomitsi [Theoretical and methodological ambush the development of accounting in the transformational economy]. Problemy razvytyia teorii bukhhalterskoho ucheta, analyza i kontrolia: monohr. Brest-Zhytomyr: ZhDTU. P.191-211. [in Ukrainian].
Pushkar, M. S. (2007). Metodolohiia obliku abo yakoiu povynna staty teoriia [Accounting methodology or what the theory should become]: monohr. Ternopil: Kart-blansh. 359 p. [in Ukrainian].
Khomyn, P. Ya., Zhuravel, H. P. (2007). Paradyhmy i kontroverzy bukhhalterskoho obliku ta zvitnosti (sproby konsekventnoho analizu) [Paradigms and controversies of accounting and reporting (attempts of conservative analysis)]: monohr. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka. 299 p. [in Ukrainian].
Holov, S. F. (2005). Rozvytok bukhhalterskoho obliku i audytu vidpovidno do planu dii “Ukraina-YeS” [Development of accounting and auditing in accordance with the “Ukraine-EU” action plan]. Vestnyk bukhhaltera i audytora Ukrainy - Bulletin of the accountant and auditor of Ukraine. № 15-16. P. 6-7. [in Ukrainian].
Maliuha, N. M. (2005). Bukhhalterskyi oblik v Ukraini: teoriia y metodolohiia, perspektyvy rozvytku: Monohrafiia [Accounting in Ukraine: theory and methodology, development prospects: monogr.]. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU, 548 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lehenchuk, S. F. (2010). Teoriia i metodolohiia bukhhalterskoho obliku v umovakh postindustrialnoi ekonomiky: monohr. [Theory and methodology of accounting in the conditions of the post-industrial economy: monogr.]. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU. 652 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lehenchuk, S. F. (2012). Bukhhalterske teoretychne znannia: vid teorii do metateorii: monohr. [Accounting theoretical knowledge: from theory to metatheory: monogr.]. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU. 336 p. [in Ukrainian].
Pylypenko, L. M. (2016). Rozvytok kontseptsii pobudovy systemy publichnoi zvitnosti korporatsii v umovakh postindustrialnoi ekonomiky: monohrafiia [The development of concepts for building a system of public reporting of corporations in the conditions of the post-industrial economy: a monogr.]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky. 336 p. [in Ukrainian].
Zhuk, V. N. (2013). Osnovy instytutsionalnoy teorii bukhhalterskoho ucheta: monohrafyia [Fundamentals of the institutional theory of accounting: monogr.]. K.: Ahrarnaia nauka. 408 p. [in Russian].
Voinarenko M. P., Leontovych-Pelykh O. K. (2000). Do novoi paradyhmy bukhhalterskoho obliku v Ukraini [To the new paradigm of accounting in Ukraine]. Visnyk ZhITI - Bulletin of ZhITI, 12, 133-138 [in Ukrainian].
Koriahin, M. V., Kutsyk, P. O. (2016). Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku bukhhalterskoi zvitnosti: monohrafiia [Problems and prospects for the development of accounting knowledge: monogr.]. Kyiv: Interservis, 276 p. [in Ukrainian].
Umantsiv, H. V. Otsinka obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti yak peredumovy yikh bukhhalterskoho vidobrazhennia [Rating of intellectual property objects as a prerequisite for their accounting display]. Retrieved from http://intellect-expert.com/ uk/korisni-resursi/59-otsinka-ob-ektiv-intelektualnoji-vlasnosti-yak-peredumova- jikh-bukhgalterskogo-vidobrazhennya [in Ukrainian].
Holov S. F. (2007). Bukhhalterskyi oblik v Ukraini: analiz stanu ta perspektyvy rozvytku: monohrafiia [Accounting in Ukraine: analysis of the state and development prospects: monogr.]. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 453 p. [in Ukrainian].
Kyreitsev, H. H. (2008). Hlobalizatsyia ekonomiki i unifikatsyia metodolohii bukhhalterskoho ucheta: Nauchny doklad [Globalization of the economy and unification of accounting methodology: Scientific report]. Izd. 2-e, pererab. y dop. Zhytomyr: ZhHTU. 76 p. [in Russian].
Muravskyi, V. V. Kompiuterno-komunikatsiina forma obliku: monohrafiia [Computer and communication form of accounting: monogr.]. Ternopil: TNEU, 2018. 486 p. [in Ukrainian].