Determinants of accounting for depreciation of non-current tangible assets in construction

Authors

  • Zenovii-Mykhailo Zadorozhnyi West Ukrainian National University
  • Volodymyr Muravskyi West Ukrainian National University
  • Marian Zadorozhnyi West Ukrainian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/

Keywords:

accounting, depreciation, non-current assets, depreciation calculation methods, accounting registers, construction companies

Abstract

Introduction. In the modern economy, the ongoing transformations of socio-economic development and the influence of time on business entities create the need for continuous re-evaluation of the value and usefulness of a company’s assets, which is directly reflected through the process of depreciation. At the same time, the emergence of new non-current assets and the expansion of their functional characteristics highlight the necessity to improve the methodology of accounting and depreciation calculation as a key tool for ensuring the accurate and comprehensive reflection of asset value in a dynamic business environment.

Purpose of the article is to specify and supplement the determinants of depreciation accounting for non-current assets by improving its theoretical positioning, methods of calculation, and procedures for recognition in accounting accounts and registers.

Results. The study analyzes the peculiarities of depreciation accounting for non-current assets of construction enterprises and substantiates the need to enhance methodological approaches to their depreciation. The relationship between the concepts of “wear” and “depreciation” is identified, and the expediency of considering this interdependence when forming sub-accounts under the account “Depreciation (wear) of non-current assets” is justified. The necessity of unifying the methodology for calculating depreciation of fixed and non-current tangible assets by abandoning the simplified “50%–50%” and “100%” methods, which distort the financial results of enterprises, is substantiated. The paper reveals the potential of using accounting information to form electronic accounting registers that reflect structural, dynamic, and cost-related characteristics of depreciation processes.

Conclusions and prospects. The implementation of the proposed improvements in the accounting of non-current asset depreciation contributes to the formation of a comprehensive information base for meeting the needs of internal and external stakeholders involved in managing the efficiency of non-current tangible assets in the construction sector. In the future, data from electronic registers on depreciation can be used to develop variable forms of internal and external reporting on the company’s non-current assets, which represents a promising direction for further scientific inquiry.

References

Horbachova, L. V., Ionin, Ye. Ye. (2018). Accounting of fixed assets: domestic and foreign experience. Bulletin of the Student Scientific Society of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, 1 (10), 153–157. https://jvestnik-sss.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/5486/5513. [in Ukrainian].

Hrechko, A. V. (2018). Harmonization of the domestic system of accounting for fixed assets with international standards under the conditions of strengthening European integration processes. Modern Problems of Economics and Entrepreneurship, 22. 135–141. http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/ article/view/146406. [in Ukrainian].

Dolishnia, T. I., Medvid, I. B. (2018). International experience of accounting for fixed assets: a comparative aspect. Black Sea Economic Studies, 28 (2), 126–129. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ bses_2018_28%282%29 28. [in Ukrainian].

Korolenko, V. O., Hevlych, L. L. (2018). Features of accounting for fixed assets according to national and international standards. Bulletin of the Student Scientific Society of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, 10, 153–157. https://jvestnik-sss.donnu.edu.ua/article/ view/6190/6219. [in Ukrainian].

Moskaliuk, H. O., Tsukanova, V. O. (2021). Fixed assets through the prism of accounting under NAS and IFRS: a comparative analysis. Scientific Bulletin of Odesa National Economic University, 9–10 (286–287), 86–91. http://n-visnik.oneu.edu.ua/collections/2021/286-287/page. php?id=abstract/ukr/86-91. [in Ukrainian].

Selivanova, N. M., Popovych, K. F. (2019). Evaluation of international experience in calculating depreciation of fixed assets. Economics: Time Realities, 2 (42), 63–70. doi: 10.5281/ zenodo.3407459. [in Ukrainian].

Ihnashkina, T. B., Shura, N. O. (2009). Substantiation of theoretical aspects of the definitions “wear” and “depreciation” in modern economic science. Efficient Economy, 4. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/efek_2009_4_6. [in Ukrainian].

Mekh, Ya. V., Fedoronko, N. I. (2009). Problems of accounting for depreciation in Ukraine and ways to overcome them. Bulletin of Zhytomyr State Technological University. Economic Sciences, 3, 111–114. https://library.wunu.edu.ua/images/stories/praci_vukladachiv/Факультет%20ОА/ КАРК/івануса%20н/проблеми%20обліку%20амортизації%20в%20україні.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Muzhevych, N. (2010). Choosing the optimal depreciation method for construction machinery. Economic Analysis, 6, 75–78. https://econa.at.ua/Vypusk_6/muzevych.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Panchuk, L. V. (2010). Methods of calculating depreciation of fixed assets. Formation of a Market Economy, 23, P. 516–528. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/709. [in Ukrainian].

Shchyrska, O. V. (2012). The economic essence and accounting definition of depreciation. Actual Problems of Economics, 8, 68–74. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2012_8_11. [in Ukrainian].

National Accounting Standard (Regulation) 7 “Fixed Assets”: approved by the Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine of April 27, 2000, No. 92. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z0288-00#Text. [in Ukrainian].

International Accounting Standard 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”. IFRS Foundation, 2023. https://mof.gov.ua/uk/mizhnarodni-standarti-finansovoi-zvitnosti. [in English].

Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Muravskyi, V., Semaniuk, V., Humenna-Derii, M. (2022). Global management accounting principles in the system of providing resource potential of the enterprise. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3 (44), 63–71. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3765. [in English].

Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Sudyn, Y., Muravskyi, V. (2018). Goodwill assessment in enterprise management: innovative approaches using computer and communication technologies. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 43–53. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2018.4-04. [in English].

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Zadorozhnyi, Zenovii-Mykhailo, et al. “Determinants of Accounting for Depreciation of Non-Current Tangible Assets in Construction”. Herald of Economics, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 91-100, https://doi.org/10.35774/.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

41-50 of 480

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.