Using the Idealization Method in Research on the Development of Accounting Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2026.01.157Keywords:
accounting theory, information requests, accounting institute, accounting reporting, idealization method, idealized modelAbstract
The development of accounting science is accompanied by a constant search for practical methodological approaches that can explain complex economic processes and the evolution of accounting systems. One such approach is the idealization method, which involves a conscious simplification of reality to highlight the essential properties of research objects and build theoretical models. The article aims to assess the potential of using the idealization method by accounting researchers and to develop an author’s idealized model that will help better understand the patterns of interaction among components in a holistic accounting system within the context of an information society. To assess the practice of using the idealization method in scientific research, the authors conducted a content analysis of publications by Ukrainian and foreign scientists. For further interpretation of the results, they employed methods of synthesis, abstraction, comparison, induction, and deduction. Presenting the research results in the form of drawings enabled an increase in their level of visualization. The author’s idealized model is built using a metaphorical method, a selected basic definition, and identified key features. To better illustrate the principles of functioning of this model, the mechanism of action of a mechanical pendulum clock was used, which characterizes the innovative approach of this article. The idealization method is widely used not only in accounting research, but also dominates the works of representatives of economic thought. However, some limitations require the use of idealization in combination with other methods. In particular, there is always a risk that excessive abstraction can lead to the loss of practical relevance of the research results. On the other hand, the next stage is required to verify them – empirical verification. As the author’s idealized model demonstrates, information requests drive the development of accounting. At the same time, traditional information requests from stakeholders ensure the sustainable functioning of the accounting system, while innovative ones facilitate its evolutionary and transformational development. Thus, there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the range of information requests and the methodological capabilities of accounting. The formation of various types of reporting and other accounting data occurs within a strictly defined coordinate system, established by accounting standards, principles, and methods. The results of this study have theoretical significance, demonstrating how the idealization method can be applied in research on the development of accounting science. The idealized model presented in the article can be improved upon in future research and utilized in the development of textbooks on accounting theory.
References
Zhuk, V. M. (2018). Development of accounting theory: institutional aspect. Kyiv: NNTs “IAE”. 408 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lehenchuk, S. F. (2015). The structure of scientific theory in accounting: philosophical analysis. International collection of scientific papers, 21(17), 205–215. http://library.ztu.edu.ua/e-copies/ Zbirnyk/Problems_%20accounting_2_17/28.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Gogol, T. (2012). Accounting methodology as a direction of scientific research in innovative economics. Bulletin of the Ternopil National Economic University, 2, 151–158. http://dspace. tneu.edu.ua/handle/316497/15555. [in Ukrainian].
Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., & Muravskyi, V. (2025). Problematic Issues Concerning the Accounting Method. Oblik i finansi, 3(109), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-14-20. [in Ukrainian].
Dellaportas, S., Xue, Q., Li, J., Zhang, J., How, S. M., Lu, X., ... & Huang, K. (2025). A critique of qualitative accounting research in China. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(4), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/MEDAR-05-2025-3048. [in English].
Mathews, M. R., & Perera, M. H. B. (1993). Accounting theory and development. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Nelson. [in English].
Parker, L. D., & Warren, S. (2017). The presentation of the self and professional identity: countering the accountant’s stereotype. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1895–1924. https://doi.org/1108/AAAJ-09-2016-2720. [in English].
Uzhva, A., Belinska, S., & Lazarieva, O. (2022). Accounting and analytical support of enterprises in the digital economy. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 3, 136–140. https://doi.org/.33271/nvngu/2022-3/136. [in English].
Metcalf, K. (2022). Accounting for Complexity: Thinking With Idealisations, Models, and Data. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 9(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.9.3.7290. [in English].
Prodanchuk, M., & Ostapchuk, S. (2020). Problems and future of accounting for land resources in Ukraine. The Institute of Accounting, Control and Analysis in the Globalization Circumstances, 2, 71–80. https://doi.org/.35774/ibo2020.02.071. [in Ukrainian].
La Notte, A. (2024). How to account for nature-based solutions as the ecological assets that support economy and society. Nature-Based Solutions, 6, 100164. https://doi.org/.1016/j. nbsj.2024.100164. [in English].
Ostapchuk, S. M., Tsaruk, N. H., & Volyak, L. R. (2024). Ecosystem accounting as a component of managing Ukraineʼs recovery on the basis of sustainable development. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 2(58), 50–57. https://doi.org/.26642/pbo-2024-2(58)-50-57. [in Ukrainian].
Sawandi, N., & Thomson, I. (2014). Broadening corporate accountability: An ‘idealised’ downward accountability model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.099. [in English].
Hoover, K. D. (1994). Six queries about idealization in an empirical context. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities, 38, 43–53. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004457379_004. [in English].
Fandel, G., Hofmann, C., & Schreck, P. (2020). Editorial “Management accounting and control”. Journal of Business Economics, 90, 675–678. https://doi.org/1007/s11573-020-00997-9. [in English].
Dixon, K. (2025). Accounting for higher education: Calculative practices in curricular administration. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 102, 102805. https://doi.org/1016/j. cpa.2025.102805. [in English].
Ostapchuk, S., Pavliukovets, M., & Andrieiev, A. (2025). Development of accounting in the face of challenges posed by the information society. Economy and Society, 80. https://doi. org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-80-80. [in Ukrainian].
Smolennikov, D. O., & Buriak, A. V. (2018). Specificity of Information Requests of Stakeholders in the Financial Sector in a Context. Mechanism of Economic Regulation, 1, 53–61. https://doi. org/10.21272/mer.2018.79.04. [in Ukrainian].






